Home

Photos

Projects

Resources

Opinions

Links

I'm glad I watched... I felt Obama's debate performance was clearly superior over McCain's. Obama's answers were clear, reasoned and (I felt) convincing. His demeanor was calm and collected. McCain by contrast, repeated many of the same old endlessly debunked attacks and his answers on the issues were not convincing. His several attempts at humor fell flat or were just bizarre. He brought up Protectionism as if anyone in the audience remembered or understood. His repeated old-timey cliché metaphor that we need a 'calm hand at the Tiller' was also strange. I think that one might have last been used in the dust bowl days. His age really showed. All in all, I felt that Obama scored a dominating win in this debate and the "Town Hall" style format did not in fact serve McCain well.

Mary also noticed something revealing at the end. While Barack and Michelle stayed around for a long time, shaking hands, posing for photos, etc, Cindy McCain kept her distance from the audience, and she and her husband got out of there in a hurry.

Thankfully, the word "maverick" was never used.

More: Another couple of telling moments were when McCain showed his peevish side, asking Tom Brokaw and the audience if Obama had answered the question, implying that he had not. One was "did he say what his fine would be?" <smirk> <smirk> But I thought that Obama had in fact answered those questions (in that case, that there wouldn't be a fine).

Also shocking was McCain's sudden proposal to have the federal government directly buy bad mortgages and re-negotiate them, later followed by a seemingly casual admission that Social Security could not ultimately be saved.

I didn't hear or read much about The Good German, and hence was very pleasantly surprised after finally seeing it. This is Steven Soderbergh's WWII-era drama starring George Clooney and Kate Blanchett. It uses many stylistic devices of 1940's and 50's Hollywood films including, first and foremost, a black & white print. I wasted a good chunk of my childhood watching movies of this era on Seattle's KCPQ "Q-13" (I think they stopped filling their air-time with vintage movies right around the time I left; nearly 20 years ago). So it was kind of cool to see all those techniques and styles put to use again.

But, more importantly, it has a good plot. Set in Berlin right after the German surrender, it involves intrigue among various (and historically fairly accurate) factions: Americans who want to capture and prosecute Nazis, Americans who want to find the brightest rocket scientists to kick-start our own missile program, Russians who want to find them before we do, Germans who want to escape their complicity in Nazi war crimes, and Germans who want to cooperate and bring justice to those responsible. So given all the competing motives, you can imagine that a few plot twists are in order. Throw in a journalist just trying to get to the bottom of a story (Clooney), a corrupt Army sergeant (Tobey McGuire, his dopeyness is less out-of-place than usual here, given the actors that might have filled the role in a classic movie) and a possibly widowed German driven to prostitution (the aforementioned Blanchett) into the mix, and you have a plot that Hollywood would have loved sixty years ago.

But it still works today, and part of that is due to (no spoilers) working into the screenplay some of the actual historical facts that we have learned, namely the personal participation of German rocket scientists (including von Braun) at the slave labor camp where the V-2 was put into production. Struggle over direct evidence of such participation becomes a central plot-line providing additional drama with modern-day resonance.

There's nothing Hollywood does quite so well as dramatic tales of rogue cops and corrupt police departments, good guys gone bad, violent power struggles with Internal Affairs, and the bloody carnage of those who decide they're above the law. Street Kings is the latest in this long line, and it's quite entertaining. It is hard-fuggin-boiled, sometimes just about to the point of absurdity, lending it a latter-day noir-ish quality. Keanu Reeves' character is the bad cop, a "guided missile" with no regard for due process, taking on thugs and fellow officers alike. I gotta say, he's gradually become a better actor and he actually gives the role something very much akin to... ...believability. He's aided here by an exceptional cast: Forest Whitaker, Terry Crews, Jay Mohr, John Corbett, Hugh Laurie, Chris Evans, and others. I want to watch it again!

If you scored this one like a prize fight, I think McCain wins a split decision. He kept Obama on the defensive with constant mis-characterizations and other deceptive "tactics" (the foray into what is a tactic vs. what is a strategy was a weird, pointless tangent). Though Obama defended himself well, he delivered only glancing blows to McCain. The dueling dead-soldier bracelet match-up was pretty silly, I can just see them coming out next time festooned in bracelets, ribbons, and other memorabilia.

McCain was surprisingly lucid (must have been one of his good days), drawing on history and personal experience abroad, sounding stronger on foreign policy. Obama's counter that McCain's poor judgment in leading us into Iraq and away from Afghanistan was good, though delivered without requisite rhetorical punch.

But this was just round 1; I think Obama will be better served by the domestic topics, relating more of his own personal experiences, having more focused attacks, and putting McCain back on the defensive.

I noticed that McCain had a couple of grammatical slip-ups, though I'm sure nobody cares. And, BTW, why does he pronounce Washington "Warshington"? I didn't think that was an East-coast thing, and it's certainly not an Arizona thing.

McCain certainly dedicated himself to cutting government spending, while Obama seemed to claim it as an ideal, the specifics he mentioned would increase spending. Still, given the history of Republicans who pay lip service to fiscal conservatism, but making massive increases in federal spending when in office, we should be highly skeptical.

I was pleased that they both supported reviving the nuclear power industry as a component of alternative and green energies, though again, McCain seemed more committed to making it happen.

Obama's biggest points of the night came early on, during the economic discussion, skillfully laying out his tax plan and disparaging McCain's. And why, given all the flux, couldn't they have switched the topic to the economy?

... when the isht hits the fan! Here is just a couple of random thoughts related to the meltdown of America's financial industry.

• Consolidation is the root of the problem, not so much regulation and the lack thereof, except as they play into it. Under a more ideal system, all that bad debt would be spread among many more (smaller) banks and other lenders. Some would fail, the ones that found the right amount of risk would survive. This system would be a freer market, and more capitalistic, not less. The problem is that five firms were allowed to exceed the SEC's debt-to-capital ratio.
• This looks real bad for McCainiac & Co. Less than 24 hours after he declared our economy "fundamentally sound", that same economy was revealed to be within days of a complete meltdown (which may still happen). He should have known better; his own son managed a bank that ultimately failed, like a number of others have. As long as the news media focuses on real issues, McCain's campaign, such as it is, is in trouble.
• I don't want to be bailing out people who were stupid enough to get an "interest only" loan... or anyone who was willing to sell it to them. What about people who speculated on an ARM loan and are now getting burned? Drawing the line starts to get difficult after that.

Now, clearly, McCain's "suspension" of his campaign is a cynical and desperate ploy. But it's also an extremely odd thing to happen in a presidential race. Why not put Palin in charge of the campaign while he heads off to Washington? Oh right... if she can't step in to lead the campaign, obviously she couldn't step in as president.

It's one step short of using a crisis to suspend the election itself. Would the G.O.P. stoop so low to keep their hold on power?

Arsenals Of Folly by Richard Rhodes is the third in his nuclear trilogy, preceded by The Making Of The Atomic Bomb and Dark Sun: The Making Of The Hydrogen Bomb. Folly skips ahead to the 1980's and the height of the Cold War, the Reagan-Gorbachev summits, and subsequent disarmament treaties.

This is really an exceptional book, very well documented, with a lot of insight on this period of history. I found several things surprising. In order of decreasing shock value:

• Reagan was evidently a sincere believer in Armageddon theology, and that he himself was fated to play a significant, Biblical role in end times. This was perhaps the root of his stubborn attachment to SDI (Star Wars): the idea that it would be part of this prophetic scheme, providing the means to survive an apocalypse. I personally find it quite frightening that the leader of the free world for eight years was so disconnected from rationality. Bush Jr. may be of the same persuasion, though perhaps without the ego to place himself in such a direct role, and certainly without the mental capacity to really think it through. And now again, with Palin, we have another who could imagine herself in that role (not to mention McCain's new found willingness to appease evangelicals).
• Neoconservatives, including many who are responsible for our current misadventures, actively worked to scuttle negotiations with Russia. And they were successful in a number of cases. In a strategy that exactly presaged Iraq, "Team B" interpreted intelligence data with a worst-case bias, in order to fit their pre-conceived politics. Another stratagem was Richard Perle's "zero solution", designed to sound fair but be unacceptable to the Soviets, whereupon they could use this seeming intransigence to reduce the level of support for serious talks. Other "poison pills" weakened our commitment to existing treaties (ABM) or ones in progress (SALT II). Another underhanded, even treasonous, tactic was to leak certain internal memos prior to summits, basically creating P.R. obstacles for the non-hardliner faction to overcome.
• Reagan, perhaps because of a post-assassination-attempt deathbed conversion, became personally committed to the idea of eliminating all nuclear weapons. This newfound role was dramatically out of step with the hawks in his own cabinet. However, his continued attachment to SDI, skillfully manipulated by the neo-cons, led to an impasse at Reykjavik.
• The "triumphalist" view of the Cold War, that far-sighted U.S. war planners intended all along to drive the Soviet Union into economic collapse through the vehicle of astronomical weapons spending, is incorrect. Key players of the period deny it.

Barely covered by the mainstream media, the crackdown on the press and protesters at the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis / St. Paul is nonetheless quite disturbing. From what I've read, the tactics included "pre-emptive" arrests for "conspiracy to riot", coordinated by federal, state, and local authorities. Independent and even floor-pass credentialed journalists (including an AP photographer and nationally syndicated radio broadcaster Amy Goodman) were among those arrested while doing their jobs.

The contrast to Chicago 1968 is stark; the police riot outside the DNC and subsequent trials captured national attention that still resonates today. Now, similar actions on a broader scale barely make the news. As a number of comments have pointed out, we paid more attention to protesters in Beijing during the Olympics.

Basically, the carefully scripted nature of these political conventions is now enforced, brutally if necessary, limiting the activity of the free press; one more boot on the neck of democracy in America.

A few weeks back, I posted a couple of examples of trivial (but graphical) Twitter clients. Here's a slightly more featured example, which uses the PyQt library to hook into the powerful cross-platform Qt toolkit from Python.

Here's a screenshot. It shows how many characters you have remaining, and disables posting if the character count is over the limit. Below is the code. To run on a Debian system you'd install the python-qt4 and python-httplib2 packages. I think it is a good example that for simple applications, the Python-Qt framework is pretty nice, though in lines of code, it would probably be about the same in Java (and probably less in JavaFX). Another nice thing is that you can put together the UI with Qt Designer.

Zetcode's PyQt4 tutorial and the official PyQt documentation were indispensable.

#!/usr/bin/python

import sys, urllib, httplib2
from PyQt4 import QtCore, QtGui

class PTwitter(QtGui.QWidget):

    max = 140
    uid = 'guymac'
    pwd = '********'

    twitUpdate = 'http://twitter.com/statuses/update.xml'
    twitCloser = 'http://twitter.com/account/end_session'

    def postTweet(self):
        mesg = self.txt.toPlainText()
        post = urllib.urlencode({ 'status' : mesg })

        try:
            http = httplib2.Http()

            # override the default (no exceptions, status in response)
            http.force_exception_to_status_code = False

            http.add_credentials(self.uid, self.pwd)

            resp, content = http.request(self.twitUpdate, 'POST', post)

            if resp and resp.status == 200:
                self.lbl.setText('Twitter updated!')
            else:
                raise httplib2.HttpLib2Error, 'No response'
        except httplib2.HttpLib2Error, ex:
            print ex
            self.lbl.setText(ex.__str__())

        http.request(self.twitCloser)

    def updateLabel(self):
        len = self.txt.toPlainText().size()
        self.lbl.setText('%d char(s) remaining' % (self.max-len))

        # disable the post button if chars > max
        self.pb1.setEnabled(len <= max)

    def __init__(self):
        QtGui.QWidget.__init__(self)

        # Button to post
        self.pb1 = QtGui.QPushButton('Post')

        # Button to close
        self.pb2 = QtGui.QPushButton('Close')

        # TextField for input
        self.txt = QtGui.QTextEdit()

        # Label to show characters remaining
        self.lbl = QtGui.QLabel()

        tab = QtGui.QGridLayout()
        tab.setSpacing(5)

        tab.addWidget(self.txt, 0, 0, 1, 2)
        tab.addWidget(self.lbl, 1, 0, 1, 2)
        tab.addWidget(self.pb1, 2, 0)
        tab.addWidget(self.pb2, 2, 1)

        self.setLayout(tab)
        self.setWindowTitle('PyQt4 Twitter')

        self.updateLabel()

        # connect text change to number of chars message
        self.connect(self.txt, QtCore.SIGNAL('textChanged()'),
            self.updateLabel)

        # connect post click to send message
        self.connect(self.pb1, QtCore.SIGNAL('clicked()'),
            self.postTweet)

        # connect close click to quit
        self.connect(self.pb2, QtCore.SIGNAL('clicked()'),
            QtGui.qApp, QtCore.SLOT('quit()'))

# application
app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv)

# window
win = PTwitter()

# display
win.show()

# execute
sys.exit(app.exec_())

I'm disappointed with O'Reilly's Python Cookbook (Second Edition). It's unfortunate because I've found their "Cookbooks" for other languages to be A) a good way to pick up the fundamentals while B) learn recipes for common programming tasks. The Python Cookbook skimps on the language fundamentals while, despite its huge bulk, having few recipes for task types that I can imagine needing to know.

For instance, there are no examples of an XPath API, which I'd consider indispensable. One of the first things I wanted to do was take the Netflix Queue XHTML and simply extract the titles. I dug up some old Java code to do it.

The chapter on XML doesn't even have any examples of creating XML! And every Python example I've seen so far does it by simply spitting out strings. Where are the equivalents of StAX, DOM, JDOM, or (wishful thinking) E4X?

I appreciate Python's attempt to be clean, consistent, and object-oriented... in marked contrast to Perl's hodge-podge gumbo of pre-OOP stuff like C, Bourne shell, and so on. But the OOP chapter is just bizarre, full of things that I've never needed to worry about in Java.

The chapters on network and web programming don't show how to post to a web server or do authentication. The online library reference is useful, but very short on complete examples. I could go on, but suffice it to say that without Google searches, I wouldn't have gotten very far with Python.

Today I ran the 39th annual Saguaro National Park Labor Day Run, completing the 8 mile course in 80 minutes (full results). This is a demanding course at the base of the Rincon Mountains; there is one monster hill and continuous rolling hills over the rest of the course (there are really no flat sections). Lots of crazy people like to get out there at dawn and sweat like, uh, crazy; once again, I was one of them.

I've been focused on this all during the month of August, building up my ability to run it non-stop, and then running the course three times. So 80 minutes was good for me: a low-intensity pace for the first six miles, then stepping it up a little once I knew I could finish. At the end, I was running hard, trying to get under that 80 minute mark, and was only a second over. Next year, I'll try to keep a constant, higher intensity and get it down to an hour. The best runners are at about double that pace. Some of those dudes out there look like they're about ready to sweat blood or have a heart explode, and I'm not interested in that level of effort, but now I know I can do slightly better.

Last year at the same event, I really struggled. I wasn't in very good shape and showed up late and didn't know where to register. I felt bad and walked much of the course. Unfamiliarity with it made everything worse. So starting in late July, I started running it in portions, starting near the end. Sooner than expected, I could do all eight miles. So I kept the pace I was comfortable with, starting near the middle of the pack and not passing many runners.

The next event I'm doing is a 10-miler in downtown Tucson in October. The course is much flatter, so I'm working towards 8-minute-miles. Following that, who knows, eventually a full marathon?

The Olympics have been incredibly entertaining this year. I didn't pay a great deal of attention to the 2000 Sydney and 2004 Athens games, but I've been glued to the set this time around. Originally I planned to just subscribe to the NBColympics.com 'favorite videos' RSS feed but two things ruined that plan: a) the competition was too good to wait and b) it requires a Windows machine or an Intel Mac.

So that has been the only technical travesty of these games. Microsoft will find some way to screw you once again. Apparently they paid for the rights to provide the online video, so used it to push their latest .NET platform instead of the well-established industry standards in cross-platform online video (e.g. Flash/H.264 like YouTube). I can put up with waiting for primetime broadcasts and have mostly managed to avoid seeing headlines that spoiled the action.

Phelps is certainly the greatest Olympian of all time. But don't forget 32-year-old Jason Lezak, whose clutch relay swims won two of those golds. The moment of the Games was when he beat the French dude Bernard, who smugly figured his team had, as promised, "smashed" the Americans.

Another great moment was when Constantina Tomescu, the Romanian, pulled ahead in the middle of the woman's marathon, building an unchallenged lead and cruising alone to the finish. She's a 38-year-old mom! And of course, following the theme of "middle-aged" world-class athletes, there was swimmer Dara Torres at 41 picking up several medals.

I tuned out a lot of the gymnastics except for the team finals, Shawn John doing incredible leaps but Moscow-born Nastia Luikin having better finishes. The age of the Chinese gymnasts appears to be finally getting some IOC investigation, but I doubt anything will come of it.

So I figured out a reason to use twitter. No, not publishing random thoughts--anything worth a tweet is too infrequent. And not describing my daily whereabouts--there's little utility in that. What I'm doing instead is a fitness activity log. Not that anyone will care, but it does a) provide me a log which is useful for training and b) give some extra motivation vis-à-vis the mere possibility that my friends and co-workers might check it out.

The Yes Men are prankster activists attempting to show the harm caused by global corporatism. They first became known for a fake GW Bush campaign site, for which the real GW famously said "There outta be limits to freedom."

Their movie has some truly hilarious pranks. The clips are on YouTube (of course!) but require some intros, as they are missing the long lead-ins which make them much funnier.

In the first, they pose as WTO representatives at a conference in Finland. After a presentation favorably comparing the use of third world sweatshops to slavery (among other outrageous statements), they whip out a demonstration, a futuristic business suit that allows managers to watch their workers by means of a giant phallic extension with a TV screen embedded in it, the Employee Visualization Appendage.

Amazingly, the stuffed shirts at the conference never catch on that they are being pranked. Here's the clip.

In another, they give a talk before an economics class to introduce a new plan to feed starving people in the Third World and at the same time make lots of money. After generously feeding the entire class with McDonald's, they show a video of the concept which is called "ReBurger." Let's just say that it would give new meaning to the phrase "ordering a number two." Here's the clip. Shocked and disgusted, the class ultimately does realize it is a joke.